Comparing editorial comments
Comparing Editorial
comments
Similarities
Small masthead
Column style – text based (no images)
Authorative, persuasive tone
Subheading outlines opinion
Based on current affairs
2-3 different comment articles
Differences
The Guardian is more factual and uses statistics and events
outside of the discussed topic to back up their points
The Daily Mail is more opinionated; they use less evidence than
The Guardian in their articles.
The Guardian is more objective whereas The Daily Mail is
more biased in their articles.
In the articles we analysed, The Daily Mail didn’t propose
anything to sort out the problem that was being discussed, whereas The Guardian
did.
The guardian gives a more emotive read compared to the daily
mail.
The use of metaphors and imagery can allow a more emotive
read in the guardian’s article
The guardian’s readership would consist of a higher-class
audience.
Uses and gratifications theory:
The Guardian
Identity - The comment on this issue is mainly associated
with climate change, a topic that can be disagreed with by many but is largely
recognised by a mass population. Therefore this comment will be highly praised
by a larger audience (as it is a view they can relate to) an audience that will
now continue to buy the guardian for these viewpoints.
Educate- The use of statistics throughout the comment can
educate the readers on the topic further. Using this evidence allows the reader
to gather more information to fuel their viewpoints. The comment itself is a
factual piece so is overall educative.
Entertain – The article is a more informative piece about an
environmental issue, so it doesn’t allow as much entertainment as a daily mail
comment piece. However the use of metaphors and imagery can allow for an
emotive read.
Social interaction – The piece covers a global issue so it
is definitely a recognised topic by most people.
Comments
Post a Comment